Search Results

{{searchSuggestion.title}}
{{searchSuggestion.date}}

No Result Found.

Fact Check: Modi as a CM of Gujarat opposed minority scholarship while as a PM he is now promoting it

  • Share

Summary

Narendra Modi, as a CM had strongly objected to minority scholarship scheme but had to bow down to supreme court order. 

However, it is not clear how PM Modi views this minority scholarship as a PM considering his government has decided to increase the number of scholarships to the minority community.

Last week, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, India’s Minister for Minority Affairs announced that scholarships shall be awarded to five crores ‘minority’ students over the next five years. The central government was widely criticized on social media and people accused the PM Modi of minority appeasement.

A Twitter user Naina reminded that when the scholarship scheme for minorities was first announced by the UPA government in 2008, the Gujarat government led by Narendra Modi was the only state to oppose the scheme.

Her tweet reads "In 2008 UPA Govt had announced scholarship scheme for minorities based on Sachar Committee's report then Gujarat was the only state that opposed d scholarship based on Religion under CM Modi. He had said any scholarship based on Religion is an act of Appeasement and against Constitution"

The Ministry of Minority Affairs was created on 29th January 2006 to ensure a focused approach to the issues relating to the minorities and to play a pivotal role in the overall policy,  planning,  coordination,  evaluation and review of the regulatory and development program for the benefit of the minority communities.

The central government launched this scholarship scheme in 2008 for five minority communities (Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist and Parsi) through which it funded 75 percent of the allotted amount, with the balance expected to be borne by the state government. This scheme is meant for children whose parents do not have annual incomes above 100,000 rupees, and each of the student beneficiaries was expected to get about 850 rupees a year for their studies.

The Gujarat government, however, had refused to implement this scheme in the state. 

PIL and High Court Order

In 2011, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) case was filed by Congressman from Bhuj Adam Chaki in the Gujarat High Court, and in February the Gujarat High Court in a majority decision rejected the contention of the Narendra Modi government that the scheme was discriminatory in nature.

In 2012, A division bench of justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and justice J B Pardiwala further held that government cannot give minority benefits to any community on religious lines as such a move was in violation of Article 15(1) of the Constitution."There cannot be the scope of conferring monetary benefits based on religion," it observed. The bench refused to act on its decision and it refers the issue to a larger bench which would decide if the pre-matric scholarship scheme for students from the minority community was violative of the constitution.

In 2013, out of the five judges of a larger bench, three gave judgment in the favor of the scheme, upholding its constitutional validity and said it cannot be equated with any kind of reservation, while two other judges ruled against it. The minority opinion said that "it is our view that the scheme is discriminatory in nature and the direction should not be given to the state government to implement it.

Thus, in a majority decision, the Gujarat High Court had rejected Narendra Modi government’s contention that Centre’s pre-matriculation scholarship scheme for students of minority community was discriminatory and directed it to implement it.

The Gujarat government moved to the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat HC verdict upholding the constitutional validity of the scheme. 

Gujarat government had also strongly criticized the manner in which the PMO set up the Sachar Committee in 2005 to survey the socio-economic conditions of Muslims while ignoring other religious minorities. "The Sachar Committee is neither constitutional nor statutory. It has not taken into consideration other religious communities, i.e. Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, and Parsis. Therefore, it cannot form the basis of the scheme. The Committee's target was to help the Muslims only".

Gujarat government also argued that the state already has a similar scheme for all poor students irrespective of their religion and that the Centre's scheme amounted to discrimination based on religion.

However, on 06 May 2013, the Supreme Court of India declined to overturn a Gujarat High Court judgment upholding the constitutional validity of the central government’s scholarship scheme for deserving students of minority religions in Gujarat. 

Conclusion: It is clear that Narendra Modi, as a CM of Gujarat had strongly objected to minority scholarship scheme but had to bow down to the supreme court's order. 

However, it is not clear how PM Modi views this minority scholarship as a PM considering his government has decided to increase the number of scholarships to the minority community.

  • Share

Note: You can reach out to us at support[at]facthunt.co.in if you find any issue with our articles.


COMMENTS

{{comment.user.fname}} {{comment.user.lname}}, {{comment.date}}

{{urlify(comment.comment)}}.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Please Login or signup to share your views on this article

Support Fact Hunt

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Culprits

POPULAR POSTS

All you need to know about opposition leaders state-sponsored hacking claim
by FactHunt Admin 2023-11-01 07:02:25
No, Passengers without Burqas Were Not Prevented From Boarding A Bus In Kerala
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-31 13:27:53
List of 17 Nepalis shared as Indians kidnapped by Hamas
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-18 12:54:13
Fact Check: Was an Afghanistan Cricket team supporter beaten by Indians during world cup?
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-13 14:59:58
Debunking the Claim: US Navy Carrying F-16 Fighter Jets to Israel
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-12 18:21:17
Daughter Nandana denies news of death of her father Amartya Sen
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-10 19:47:46
Edited Press Release shared on social media to falsely claim that US sends $8Bn in aid to Israel
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-10 07:02:46
Viral Video From Azerbaijan Falsely Shared As Israeli Generals Detained by Hamas Fighter
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-10 05:04:02
Uday Kotak Calls Out Impostor LinkedIn Account Promoting Crypto currencies
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-07 15:40:48
Debunking the Myth: Giant Octopus Attacking a Car in Qatar
by FactHunt Admin 2023-10-06 19:06:05
Image of a train decorated with Flowers for Onam is AI generated
by FactHunt Admin 2023-08-25 19:42:05
Debunking the Myth: Tea or Coffee Without Brushing Doesn't Cause Cavities
by FactHunt Admin 2023-09-10 19:57:56
Debunking the Claim that SBI Will Deduct Rs 57.5 After 40 Withdrawals a Year
by FactHunt Admin 2023-08-12 18:28:15
Jamtara Scam Case Study: How to Stay Safe in the Face of Online Frauds
by FactHunt Admin 2023-06-07 20:36:37
Navigating the NFT World: Common Scams in the NFT Industry
by FactHunt Admin 2023-05-25 20:24:31
Understanding Cryptocurrency and the Prevalence of Scams in the Crypto Industry
by FactHunt Admin 2023-05-02 20:05:39
Debunking Online Scams: How to Recognize and Avoid Internet Fraud
by FactHunt Admin 2023-04-07 19:53:38
Fact Check: Doctored photo of BJP flag hoisting viral as a sign of "lotus blooming" in Tamil Nadu
by Aniket Datta 2022-06-08 12:50:03
Debunking the Money Received Scam on UPI payment apps like Google Pay
by FactHunt Admin 2022-12-20 19:26:40
Fact Check: Did Sourav Ganguly actually resign as the BCCI President? Rumours abound;
by Aniket Datta 2022-06-01 18:35:03

Mobile App

Available for Android

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter to get notification about new fact checks, feature updates, etc..