Search Results


No Result Found.

Fact Check: Modi as a CM of Gujarat opposed minority scholarship while as a PM he is now promoting it

  • Share


Narendra Modi, as a CM had strongly objected to minority scholarship scheme but had to bow down to supreme court order. 

However, it is not clear how PM Modi views this minority scholarship as a PM considering his government has decided to increase the number of scholarships to the minority community.

Last week, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, India’s Minister for Minority Affairs announced that scholarships shall be awarded to five crores ‘minority’ students over the next five years. The central government was widely criticized on social media and people accused the PM Modi of minority appeasement.

A Twitter user Naina reminded that when the scholarship scheme for minorities was first announced by the UPA government in 2008, the Gujarat government led by Narendra Modi was the only state to oppose the scheme.

Her tweet reads "In 2008 UPA Govt had announced scholarship scheme for minorities based on Sachar Committee's report then Gujarat was the only state that opposed d scholarship based on Religion under CM Modi. He had said any scholarship based on Religion is an act of Appeasement and against Constitution"

The Ministry of Minority Affairs was created on 29th January 2006 to ensure a focused approach to the issues relating to the minorities and to play a pivotal role in the overall policy,  planning,  coordination,  evaluation and review of the regulatory and development program for the benefit of the minority communities.

The central government launched this scholarship scheme in 2008 for five minority communities (Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist and Parsi) through which it funded 75 percent of the allotted amount, with the balance expected to be borne by the state government. This scheme is meant for children whose parents do not have annual incomes above 100,000 rupees, and each of the student beneficiaries was expected to get about 850 rupees a year for their studies.

The Gujarat government, however, had refused to implement this scheme in the state. 

PIL and High Court Order

In 2011, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) case was filed by Congressman from Bhuj Adam Chaki in the Gujarat High Court, and in February the Gujarat High Court in a majority decision rejected the contention of the Narendra Modi government that the scheme was discriminatory in nature.

In 2012, A division bench of justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and justice J B Pardiwala further held that government cannot give minority benefits to any community on religious lines as such a move was in violation of Article 15(1) of the Constitution."There cannot be the scope of conferring monetary benefits based on religion," it observed. The bench refused to act on its decision and it refers the issue to a larger bench which would decide if the pre-matric scholarship scheme for students from the minority community was violative of the constitution.

In 2013, out of the five judges of a larger bench, three gave judgment in the favor of the scheme, upholding its constitutional validity and said it cannot be equated with any kind of reservation, while two other judges ruled against it. The minority opinion said that "it is our view that the scheme is discriminatory in nature and the direction should not be given to the state government to implement it.

Thus, in a majority decision, the Gujarat High Court had rejected Narendra Modi government’s contention that Centre’s pre-matriculation scholarship scheme for students of minority community was discriminatory and directed it to implement it.

The Gujarat government moved to the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat HC verdict upholding the constitutional validity of the scheme. 

Gujarat government had also strongly criticized the manner in which the PMO set up the Sachar Committee in 2005 to survey the socio-economic conditions of Muslims while ignoring other religious minorities. "The Sachar Committee is neither constitutional nor statutory. It has not taken into consideration other religious communities, i.e. Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, and Parsis. Therefore, it cannot form the basis of the scheme. The Committee's target was to help the Muslims only".

Gujarat government also argued that the state already has a similar scheme for all poor students irrespective of their religion and that the Centre's scheme amounted to discrimination based on religion.

However, on 06 May 2013, the Supreme Court of India declined to overturn a Gujarat High Court judgment upholding the constitutional validity of the central government’s scholarship scheme for deserving students of minority religions in Gujarat. 

Conclusion: It is clear that Narendra Modi, as a CM of Gujarat had strongly objected to minority scholarship scheme but had to bow down to the supreme court's order. 

However, it is not clear how PM Modi views this minority scholarship as a PM considering his government has decided to increase the number of scholarships to the minority community.

Note: You can reach out to us at support[at] if you find any issue with our articles.


{{comment.user.fname}} {{comment.user.lname}}, {{}}



Please Login or signup to share your views on this article

Support Fact Hunt




Fact Check: No, 158 Indian soldiers are not killed in a rocket launcher attach by Chinese army
by Anubha Pandey 2020-06-02 11:48:09
Fact Check: Can regular use of sanitizer for 50 to 60 days increase risk of skin cancer?
by Anubha Pandey 2020-05-02 12:45:16
Fact Check: Three years old picture of a family committing suicide in Rajasthan revived amid migrant crisis
by Himani Joshi 2020-06-02 07:32:48
Fact Check: Truth behind the viral video and image of Indian and Chinese soldiers clash
by Anubha Pandey 2020-06-01 19:57:22
No, PM Modi did not claim to treat one crore COVID19 patients free of cost, India TV misquoted him
by Anubha Pandey 2020-06-01 17:20:59
Congress leaders shared old video from Bangladesh linking it with migrant crisis during lockdown in India
by Neel Kamal 2020-05-31 18:02:55
Fact Check: Did a migrant woman die of hunger at Muzaffarpur railway station?
by Anubha Pandey 2020-05-30 06:49:33
Fact Check: Did the National Security Advisor allegedly congratulate the Commissioner Secretary of Ladakh?
by Samyuktha Mirra 2020-05-30 05:33:42
Fact Check: An old image from Farrukhabad shared as Shivling found in Ayodhya excavation
by Himani Joshi 2020-05-29 08:34:58
Fact Check: old pictures viral on social media to show massive fire in Uttarakhand forests
by Himani Joshi 2020-05-28 08:26:55
Fact Check: Old video of a minor boy injured in anti-CAA protests revived as police brutality on Muslims
by Himani Joshi 2020-05-27 13:33:05
Fact Check: Truth behind the social media post claiming that a sadhu in Ayodhya died of hunger
by Anubha Pandey 2020-05-27 12:32:59
Fact Check: A fake message warning about increased crime rates post lock down viral on social media
by Anubha Pandey 2020-05-27 08:37:46
Fact Check: Did MHA permit all the states to open schools?
by Samyuktha Mirra 2020-05-27 05:48:56
Fact Check: Are temples charged more than mosques and churches for electricity in Tamil Nadu
by Anubha Pandey 2020-05-26 10:55:08
Fact Check: Video of a woman being beaten by her own family over land dispute in UP shared with communal narrative
by Himani Joshi 2020-05-26 08:47:12
No, the slogan of 'Chowkidar Chor Hai' was not raised during PM Modi’s recent visit to West Bengal
by Neel Kamal 2020-05-24 17:34:42
Fact Check: Truth behind the viral post showing 'handcuffed' Amit Shah being taken to the court
by Anubha Pandey 2020-05-23 09:49:19
False claim about Dr Harsh Vardhan's appointment as WHO Executive Board chairman viral on social media
by Samyuktha Mirra 2020-05-23 08:25:17
Fact Check: Last year's video of Cyclone Fani shared by Greta Thunberg claiming to be of the Cyclone Amphan
by Himani Joshi 2020-05-23 08:22:01

Mobile App

Available for Android


Subscribe to our newsletter to get notification about new fact checks, feature updates, etc..

Greetings to all our readers. We need your support to keep Fact Hunt up and running. On our 2nd anniversary, we are raising funds for the Fiscal year 2020-21. Please donate generously if you like our work.
For more details visit Fund Raise Page

Rs 100 Rs 200 Rs 500  Rs 1000

 Donate Now

Alternatively you can donate through UPI: facthunt@yesbank or you can support us on Patreon