Search Results

{{searchSuggestion.title}}
{{searchSuggestion.date}}

No Result Found.

Fact Check of Ravan's Modesty: Ravan didn't rape Sita because of his modesty?

  • Share

Summary

The infographic shared by RVCJ Media is misleading and distortion of Valmiki Ramayana. Ravana couldn’t do anything to Sita because of a curse rather than his own modesty.

"Ravan Banna Bhi Kahan Aasaan Hai? Sita Zinda Mili Ye Ram Ki Taakat Thi, Sita Pavitra Mili Ye Ravan Ki Maryada Thi". The official Facebook page of RVCJ Media wished Dussehra with the above message which can be roughly translated to "It's not easy to become Ravan. Sita was found alive because of the power of Ram but Sita was found holy because of Ravan's modesty".

Was Ravan a Modest Man? Why he couldn't touch Sita?

Ravana couldn’t attempt to rape her because he had got a curse in the past when he raped a celestial damsel. That curse was - if he ever attempts to ravish an unwilling woman, his head would explode into a thousand fragments. So, just for the love of his own life forces, he didn’t attempt rape on Sita because she was unwilling. He had made several approaches to persuade Sita to agree to come to his bed - He asked her directly, he sent his demon women and got them to put that proposal to her. Despite several persuasions and proposals, Sita didn’t agree, hence he couldn’t touch her fearing his own death due to the curse he had.

How did he get the curse?

Ravana once camped near the city of Kubera, when coming back from his mission to sister Kumbinasi from the hands of the ogre Madhu. Kumbinasi was the daughter of Kaikasi's sister. Kaikasi was, as we may recall, the mother of Ravana. After completing his mission, Ravana was resting in the vicinity of Kubera's city. With a cloudless sky, a lovely atmosphere and the love-laden songs sung by Kinnaras and Vidhyadharas, he easily fell a prey to his own lust. 

Unfortunately, he was not accompanied by any of his favourites. It so happened by sheer accident that Rambha, the celestial nymph, passed by. She was married to Nalakubara, son of Kubera and therefore in all fairness, the daughter-in-law of Ravana. Of course, Ravana was unaware of this fact at first, when he grabbed her to him. Rambha pleaded with him to restrain himself informing that she actually belongs to Nalakubara and the relationship between her and Ravana was far above carnal appeasement ( Valmiki Ramayana, Uttara Kanda, Canto XXVI, Sloka 29). "I can understand that if you are the wife of my son Indrajit. But you are the wife of my brother's son! The plea which you have given in the words, 'I am your daughter-in-law' holds good in the case of those who have (only) one husband. Celestial nymphs have no husband nor are gods committed to a single wife such is the eternal law obtaining in the realm of gods" (Sloka 39). Ravana violated her that day, though she kept pleading with him not to do so. She was not for this kind of an illicit relationship. Ravana appeased and satiated left her alone. She went to her husband Nalakubara with folded hands and tears welling up her eyes and narrated him the entire episode. 

The enraged Nalakubara poured a little water in his palms and pronounced this curse on Ravana, sprinkling the water. 

"Since O blessed lady, you stand violated by him perforce, unwilling as you were, he shall no longer be able to approach any other young woman who is unwilling to accept him. When (however) stricken with love, he will violate a woman who is unwilling to approach him, his head will actually be split into seven pieces that (very moment) (Sloka 55)

Ravana was shaken for the first time in his entire lifetime. "Hearing of the aforesaid execration, which caused his hair to stand on end, Ravana, (the ten-headed monster) felt inclined no more to copulate with women who were unwilling to approach him" (Sloka 59). And this gives relief to all women, who were devoted to their husbands and had been brought by him, says Valmiki.

Ref: Uttar Kand Valmiki Ramayana (page no -1660-1661)

Note: The exact translation of Uttar Kand has been simplified with the help of  C. Sri Vidya Rajagopalan. There are different versions of Ramayana but being the oldest version, we relate people's belief to Valmiki Ramayana.

Conclusion: The infographic shared by RVCJ Media is misleading and distortion of Valmiki Ramayana. Ravana couldn’t do anything to Sita because of a curse rather than his own modesty. 

Note: You can reach out to us at support[at]facthunt.co.in if you find any issue with our articles.


COMMENTS

{{comment.user.fname}} {{comment.user.lname}}, {{comment.date}}

{{urlify(comment.comment)}}.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Please Login or signup to share your views on this article

Support Fact Hunt

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Culprits

POPULAR POSTS

Fact Check: No, Suriname's president Chandrikapersad Santokhi is not going to be the chief guest for this year's Republic Day
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-18 17:37:46
Fact Check: No, the man seen in these pictures is not AAP MLA Somnath Bharti
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-18 16:20:40
Fact Check: No, this viral image is not related to Makar Sankranti
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-16 17:35:33
Fact Check: The video showing an ablaze truck on a flyover is from Pune, not from Hyderabad
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-16 11:10:29
Fact Check: No, this video showing protest against Hazara Killings is not from PoK
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-15 19:10:04
Fact Check: Unrelated video from Ireland falsely linked to 26 January tractor rally announced by the agitating farmers
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-15 15:56:11
An edited video of CM Mamata Banerjee shared to claim that no board exam will be conducted in Bengal this year
by Himani Joshi 2021-01-15 14:08:40
Fact Check: Did Reliance Donate A Solar Power Plant To Ram Mandir?
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-14 19:27:18
Fact Check: No, Reliance Jio's 5G trials are not the reason for bird flu in India
by Himani Joshi 2021-01-14 17:31:59
Fact Check: No, Mumbai Police did not start paying homage at Dargah under ruling Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress govt
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-13 19:38:23
Fact Check: No, this viral image of a Mosque is not from Old Delhi
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-13 17:44:20
Fact Check: Outdated images of aircraft crash shared as Indonesian plane crash
by Samyuktha Mirra 2021-01-13 09:49:16
Fact Check: Old-unrelated image showing a man in turban offering 'Namaz' falsely linked to the ongoing farmer's protest
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-13 08:29:41
Fact Check: Old-unrelated pictures falsely shared to show Virat and Anushka's newborn
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-12 19:37:57
Fact Check: Did Pak PM call present Indian government 'strong and iron-willed'?
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-12 10:54:26
Fact Check: An Old image falsely shared as baby rescued from recent Indonesia Plane Crash
by Himani Joshi 2021-01-12 08:29:08
Fact Check: No, this sculpture does not show America's ancient 'Monkey God'
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-11 14:42:26
Fact Check: This aged person seen in the viral image did not die at the ongoing farmers' protest
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-11 11:23:00
Fact Check: Old photos and videos of painting a Hindi signboard black falsely linked to ongoing farmers' protest
by Himani Joshi 2021-01-10 14:02:05
FACT CHECK: No, PM Modi is not holding 'Population Control Legislation 2021' file
by Anubha Pandey 2021-01-09 04:08:30

Mobile App

Available for Android

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter to get notification about new fact checks, feature updates, etc..